B2BKing vs Whols

By Raz Technologies · data from 23 Sept 2026 · Methodology

B2BKing leads on maintenance; Whols leads on security. Both are tracked in our wholesale pricing and roles ranking, updated 23 Sept 2026.

Side by side

Measure	B2BKing	Whols
Overall score	81.6 ▲ higher	78.8
Rank in wholesale pricing and roles	#1 ▲ higher	#2
Active installs	10,000+ ▲ higher	3,000+
Rating	4.9/5 (107 ratings)	5.0/5 (14 ratings)
Last updated	11 Sept 2026	27 Aug 2026
Adoption	85 ▲ higher	64
Maintenance	77 ▲ higher	47
Momentum	100 ▲ higher	87
Performance	69	78 ▲ higher
Satisfaction	97 ▲ higher	94
Security	45	100 ▲ higher
Published vulnerabilities (36 months)	5	0
Current WooCommerce	Yes	Not declared
HPOS (order tables)	Yes	Not declared
Cart & Checkout Blocks	Not declared	Not declared

B2BKing is more widely used: 10,000+ active installs versus 3,000+ for Whols on WordPress.org (as of 24 September 2026).
Whols has the higher WordPress.org rating: 5.00/5 from 14 ratings, versus 4.93/5 from 107 for B2BKing.
B2BKing declares HPOS (High-Performance Order Storage) compatibility; Whols does not declare it.
B2BKing was updated more recently (11 September 2026) than Whols (27 August 2026).
Whols has fewer published vulnerabilities in the last 36 months (0 versus 5 for B2BKing).
Overall, B2BKing ranks higher in PluginGauge's WooCommerce wholesale pricing ranking: #1 (81.6/100) versus #2 (78.8/100) for Whols, as of 23 September 2026.

Read the full profiles for features and security details: B2BKing · Whols.